At the end of June, the Graduate School at UWE Bristol in collaboration with Plymouth University and Bath Spa University put on a four day residential course for doctoral researchers at the fabulous Buckland Hall in the Brecon Beacons. This course was designed to give researchers the time and space to reflect on their development to date and to spend time in the company of other researchers thinking about where their research might take them. The overall theme of the course was “Building a reputation as a researcher”. Running through the programme were several topics that underpin this; communication of research, collaboration with others and understanding what drives you as a researcher. Here is the programme that gives a flavour of what we were doing.An interesting venue historically, Buckland Hall is now operated as a retreat/wedding venue. What’s great about it is that with groups the size that we have (36 researchers and a team of around 8 staff) you get exclusive use. The staff are brilliant achieving the seemingly impossible balance between being terribly efficient, catering for all your needs yet being almost out of sight the entire stay. As a course organiser I can’t tell you how valuable that is! The other feature of this venue is the ethos, the place runs on trust – trust bar, no room keys, treat the place as your own etc. and the organic vegetarian cuisine.
Having the right venue is one thing but you have to come up with a programme that is right for your participants. We’ve a lot of experience running these type of courses (since 2003 in fact) and many of them have been based on the renowned Vitae GRADSchool model. Over the past few years we have been hacking the format in part because of the diverse nature of our participants who on average tend to be older, international and from a wide range of disciplines. A further success factor in a course like this is a good balance of facilitators who understand doctoral researchers and their research.
Introduction The majority of the participants on this course arrived on the coach that we laid on (from Bristol Parkway station). No sooner than they had arrived then they were faced with me introducing them to the next four days. Here’s that slideshow.
Day 1. Getting to know you.
Like most courses you go on, the majority of your fellow participants are not known to you so inevitably there is a need to spend some time ingratiating yourself with others. We achieved this by doing three basic things; 1) running an icebreaker (building a giraffe), 2) establishing ‘home’ groups and 3) running an interview workshop. The idea behind the interview workshop, given the demographic of the participants, was to run it as a familiarisation of each others research exercise rather than a full on “this is how you perform at interviews”. I think that this worked, some folks certainly appreciated the chance to practice talking about their research and others found it fascinating to observe others being interviewed.
Day 2. Connecting with others There were three main things covered on the second day, some grounding principles in communicating research (start with why), establishing buddy pairs and the collaboration challenge. I started out the day by showing a short TED talk by Steven Addis. The take home message from this wasn’t about photography but rather to become aware of how our perspectives on things change over time and that we should be proactive in thinking about where it takes us.
The afternoon session was all about collaboration and facilitated by Richard McClatchey and Neil Willey who are both experienced researchers working on a number of large collaborative research projects. Participants used the statements they generated in the morning to propose a research project involving multiple disciplines. Here’s an overview of that …
Day 3. Motivations, integrity and communicating research in an accessible way There was a change of pace on the third day of the course to something more introspective. To set this up I reiterated how there is often more than one perspective on the same thing – I used this short TED talk by Derek Sivers to make the point.
We knew that tackling the subject of motivations and values is risky which presents a difficulty in how to pitch it to a diverse audience. For me it was important to explore for the following reasons; reconnecting with your motivation to follow a research path is beneficial during a doctorate when things aren’t going so well, it is also good to understand “what feeds your soul” when thinking about future career choices. I also believe that it is good to recognise why you do what you do (helps the communication thing!).
We spent some time introducing the concept of Social Enterprise to set up the session on the final day. This dovetails neatly with the exploration of motivations and values and also opens up a horizon for researchers that they may not have considered before.
Here’s a few resources that cover what I had to say.
Facts and figures about social enterprise in the UK
The concept of social entrepreneurship – tackling challenges across the globe
The 2 minute thesis
In the afternoon we changed gear and Jasmine Hunter Evans handed the groups a video camera with only one instruction: Go away and draft, rehearse and record your thesis in a 2 minute presentation.
Day 4. Looking to the future
The final day was all about how you could use your skills developed as a researcher in the future maybe outside of academic research. The day started with a little bit of motivation courtesy of the Do Lectures – The Path of a doer